View Full Version : Lo que la nasa no te dice acerca de Marte

Rex Mundi
27-12-05, 09:46 AM
What NASA Isn't Telling You About Mars



RAR Password:

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: black 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 2px; BORDER-TOP: black 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: black 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 2px; BORDER-BOTTOM: black 1px solid" align=middle>837430djsj48
</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle>http://www.dancingmokey.com/forums/images/buttons/sign.gif </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

From the author:


Occasionally in the news you will hear an announcement about Mars. But guess who has been the one, single source of all detailed ground-based Mars information? NASA!

Are there important images of mechanical artifacts we are not being told about that may have already been discovered? Why would they hide this?

WHY must we settle for distant images taken from orbit, when attempting to look for
indications of intelligent life from 100 miles up?

Why has the agency been “looking for past signs of water” while completely ignoring any REAL proof of life?

Is the atmosphere far denser than what we’ve been told for many years? Can we prove it?

Is the sky actually blue… and not red? Why does it have to be red?

NASA has launched a Mars Reconnaissance Observer satellite? Why?
“Reconnaissance” is a usually a military term!

The purpose of controlling information is to keep everyone in the dark while being fed BS like mushrooms. Do you still feel like a mushroom?

This book will end that treatment, when you see the dozens of artifacts, bricks, blocks, mechanical objects, objects up close with writing on them and more present on the surface of the planet – more than 71 of them.

The initial plan in reviewing the new 2003-2005 Mars’ data was to look at every significant image possible from one area, using carefully predefined criteria. It was also important to use data from the agency itself wherever possible, to prevent any accusations by skeptics of fabrication and tampering. Images were taken directly from NASA computers whenever possible.

Image tampering can only originate from inside personnel. Seven different criteria were pre-defined for image handling and inclusion in the book, and are described in detail. One of the criteria requires presenting the reader with the original source image. A notated image is also provided for accompanying text to insure clarity, and to identify objects in the image referred to by text.


Some time ago I set out to answer these questions. Could it be possible for raw science images to be available - without NASA saying a single word about any discoveries which they may have made? If the agency was to heavily censor images, someone inside might speak out and the public would take notice. In fact, incoming image censoring was tried back in the 90’s on a previous Mars mission using a third party consultant. The censoring was exposed on several science websites. Images were released in batches of 15,000 to 25,000 at a time, instead of daily! He often claimed, “Oh, I just found another 20,000 images I’m releasing.” Over and over we heard that.


Only ONE man decided what images would be released to the scientists and the world, and he wasn’t even a NASA employee! NASA put him in charge. And almost no one in the public even knew about the censorship. His name is Richard Malin of Malin Space Science Systems. He was judge, jury and decider of what images the public was allowed to see… if ever. We will never know the total number of images he sent to the digital trash can. Many scientists were angered by this self-appointed censor. Images came from Mars to NASA through the deep space network’s 100 meter satellite dishes around the globe. The data stream from Mars went straight into Richard Malin’s office before anyone else could see them.


Did data censorship take place? Yes, although it appears somewhat limited for this space mission. The book provides two examples where it was discovered images were altered to conceal something you are not supposed to see. One is in the sky, and another one on the ground. These are but two images out of more than 160 others in the book. A large body of evidence details two different areas on the planet which appear to have been occupied. There are other locations where you will see evidence of life.

The Evidence of Life is Overwhelming

This time we have overcome the censorship. After reviewing more than 10,000+ raw Mars images, the body of evidence is overwhelming that life has been present both on and above Mars. And it may still be there now. On numerous occasions during the image review and extraction process, I was astounded at the variety of objects simply lying in plain sight on the surface. Most artifacts in the book are less than a stone’s throw from the camera!

This book was written so that others could see the numerous artificial objects which have been found. If you read this book with an open mind and without any preconceived notions, it will change your perspective on life. One can easily “connect the dots” to gain a new understanding of the planet’s environment and fascinating history, which are inexorably tied together. Publicly available data, images and statements are compared against new science images and data. The contradictions to current public information about Mars can boggle the mind at first, but later it all comes together as you read on.

You will explore chronologically in detail exactly what artifacts were discovered by the
author, even though none of it has yet to be announced by NASA to the world. Once you have read the book, you will know beyond a shadow of a doubt what NASA isn’t telling you about Mars.

tomado sin permiso de::trv:

<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->