El valor de la política, pasajero; el de una ecuación, eterno, Einstein

[Pedro Navajas]

Hoy se cumplen 50 años de la muerte de Albert Einstein.

Su legado acompañará a la humanidad por los siglos de los siglos... amén.

Hoy se cumplen 50 años de la desaparición del científico más importante del siglo XX: Albert Einstein, premio Nobel de física en 1921 y creador de la teoría de la relatividad, que este año cumple cien años.

Este 2005 será dedicado a ese hombre sencillo y poco formal y a su importante legado. En Alemania -su país natal- ya se planean las celebraciones de ese centenario.

Einstein nació el 14 de marzo de 1879 en la ciudad bávara de Ulm. Fue el hijo primogénito de los judíos Hermann Einstein y de Pauline Koch. En Munich, su padre se dedicaba al comercio de novedades electrotécnicas de la época. Albert fue un niño quieto y ensimismado, que tuvo un desarrollo intelectual lento. El propio Einstein atribuyó a esa lentitud el hecho de haber sido la única persona que elaborase una teoría como la de la relatividad. "Un adulto no se inquieta por los problemas que plantean el espacio y el tiempo, pues considera que todo lo que hay que saber al respecto lo conoce ya desde su primera infancia. Yo, por el contrario, he tenido un desarrollo tan lento que no he empezado a plantearme preguntas sobre el espacio y el tiempo hasta que he sido mayor", dijo alguna vez.

Dificultades económicas

Las dificultades económicas hicieron que la familia se mudara a Milán; Einstein permaneció en Munich para terminar sus estudios secundarios, reuniéndose con sus padres al siguiente año. Comenzó su educación superior en la Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule de Zurich. El 23 de junio de 1902 empezó a prestar sus servicios en la Oficina Confederal de la Propiedad Intelectual de Berna, donde trabajó hasta 1909. En 1903 contrajo matrimonio con Mileva Maric, antigua compañera de estudios en Zurich, con quien tuvo dos hijos: Hans Albert y Eduard. En 1919 se divorció, y se casó de nuevo con su prima Elsa.

En 1905 publicó varias investigaciones. Una de ellas le valió el grado de doctor por la Universidad de Zurich, y los cuatro restantes acabaron por imponer un cambio radical en la imagen que la ciencia ofrece del universo. De éstos, el primero proporcionaba una explicación teórica, en términos estadísticos, del movimiento browniano, y el segundo daba una interpretación del efecto fotoeléctrico basada en la hipótesis de que la luz esté integrada por cuantos individuales, más tarde denominados fotones; los dos trabajos restantes sentaban las bases de la teoría de la relatividad, basada en el postulado de que la gravedad no es una fuerza, sino un campo creado por la presencia de una masa en el espacio-tiempo y que establece la equivalencia entre la energía (E) de cierta cantidad de materia y su masa (m), en términos de la famosa ecuación E = mc, donde c es la velocidad de la luz, que se supone constante.

En 1909 Einstein fue reconocido por la Europa de habla alemana como el principal pensador científico. Ese mismo año fue nombrado profesor de la universidad y después del Politécnico de Zurich, cargo que ejerció hasta 1914. Luego volvió a Alemania. Durante la Primera Guerra Mundial, Einstein fue uno de los académicos alemanes que se atrevieron a criticar la participación de su país en el conflicto bélico. Cuando Hitler llegó al poder en 1933, Einstein decidió abandonar Alemania y viajó a Estados Unidos. En 1940 adoptó la ciudadanía estadunidense. Desde 1945, fecha de la destrucción atómica de Hiroshima y Nagasaki, hasta su muerte, empeñó todo su prestigio en la causa del empleo pacífico de la energía atómica.

Entre los más eminentes

El esfuerzo de Einstein lo situó inmediatamente entre los más eminentes de los físicos europeos, pero el reconocimiento público del verdadero alcance de sus teorías tardó en llegar; el Premio Nobel de Física, que se le concedió en 1921, fue exclusivamente "por sus trabajos sobre el movimiento browniano y su interpretación del efecto fotoeléctrico". El estallido de la Primera Guerra Mundial lo forzó a separarse de su familia, por entonces de vacaciones en Suiza, y que ya no volvió a reunirse con él.

La revista The Times lo presentó como el nuevo Newton y su fama internacional creció, forzándole a multiplicar sus conferencias de divulgación por todo el mundo y popularizando su imagen de viajero de la tercera clase de ferrocarril, con un estuche de violín bajo el brazo.

Einstein, quien pasó los últimos 25 años de su vida en el Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Princeton, en Nueva Jersey, ciudad en la que murió, dijo que la política poseía un valor pasajero, mientras una ecuación valía para toda la eternidad.

Durante ese tiempo también se dedicó a la vana búsqueda de una teoría unificada de la gravedad y el electromagnetismo, las únicas dos fuerzas bien comprendidas por aquel entonces.

[MWanden]

La propaganda judía sigue madchacando... los pánfilos adorando al bobo con etiqueta de genio, un individuo que se limitó a plagiar y a robar las ideas de otros aprovechándose de su enchufe en la oficina de patentes de Munich, que no consiguió ser admitido en la facultad, que nunca tuvo ni laboratorio ni equipo y que la teoría que se le atribuye en falso no ha sido nunca probada.

Encima, nunca mencionan palabra de su colaboraciòn en el genocidio nuclear. Vergonzoso.

El bobo se burla del mundo...

http://www.arianuova.org/arianuova.it/arianuova.it.data/Stationeries/fotoxarticoli/Einstein.jpg

[Spiderman]

Yo he oído mucho sobre el gran plagio de este hombre, quien se proclamó ateo innumerables veces. Tienes alguna liga seria hacia esos plagios?

Saludos.

[Le Rouge]

Alguna vez leí algo al respecto, pero no me quedó la impresión de un plagio, sino de que algunos científicos habían fabricado teorías incompletas, que llegaban por decir al 95%, pero siempre faltaba la parte final, y Einstein fue el que concluyó el trabajo. Es decir, la ecuación de E=mc2 es original de Einstein, pero el procesi por el que llegó a ella fue contruído por otros en buena parte. Lo cual, por supuesto que no le quita ni una centésima de mérito.


Saludos.

[MWanden]

Alguna vez leí algo al respecto, pero no me quedó la impresión de un plagio, sino de que algunos científicos habían fabricado teorías incompletas, que llegaban por decir al 95%, pero siempre faltaba la parte final, y Einstein fue el que concluyó el trabajo. Es decir, la ecuación de E=mc2 es original de Einstein, pero el procesi por el que llegó a ella fue contruído por otros en buena parte. Lo cual, por supuesto que no le quita ni una centésima de mérito.


Saludos.

La ecuación famosa no es de Einstein sino de otro científico italiano que la publicó antes, aparte de que las transformaciones de Lorentz ya aniquilaron dicha teoría de la relatividad especial, que nunca ha sido probada.

Sin un mínimo de medios, como un laboratorio y un equipo de científicos, es imposible que nadie tenga la "ocurrencia" de inventarse ninguna teoría de algo que no existe. Encima, ese señor demostró durante toda su vida que no tenía nada de especial, y que tenía que recurrir a la ayuda de su mujer, matemática, para hacer los deberes...

Los detalles, en este enlace.
http://www.rense.com/general19/ital.htm

[MWanden]

Albert Einstein
-- was he a thief, a liar and a plagiarist?
ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The Often-Repeated Lie=Truth,' he has been made an idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius.

THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept and moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary -- he stole the ideas of others, and the Jew-controlled media made him a 'hero.'

When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story.

The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.

This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!

Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was not competent to hold a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.

He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.

Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.

Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education. THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:

The foundation of the photon theory of light;
The equivalence of energy and mass;
The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).

This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:

In the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and
Since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place.
This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.

This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's. FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.

Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature.

James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.

This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity.

They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light. In response to this problem, in 1880, the Irish physicist George Fitzgerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the Michelson Morley experiment could be explained if, ". . . the length of material bodies change, according as they are moving through the either or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."

THIS IS THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, 13 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN'S PAPER!

FURTHER . . . IN 1892, HENDRIK LORENTZ, of the Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and Fitzgerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction.

In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, "Lorentz transformations," the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in "Einstein's paper" regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.

The Frenchman Poincaré‚ had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper: ". . . we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."

Professor Umberto Bartocci, a mathematical historian, of the University of Perugia claims that Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly used De Pretto's insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed.

De Pretto had stumbled on the equation, but not the theory of relativity, while speculating about ether in the life of the universe, said Prof Bartocci. It was republished in 1904 by Veneto's Royal Science Institute, but the equation's significance was not understood.

According to Professor Bartocci, a Swiss Italian named Michele Besso alerted Einstein to the research and in 1905 Einstein published his own work. It took years for his breakthrough to be grasped. When the penny finally dropped, De Pretto's contribution was overlooked while Einstein went on to become the century's most famous scientist. De Pretto died in 1921.

"De Pretto did not discover relativity but there is no doubt that he was the first to use the equation. That is hugely significant. I also believe, though it's impossible to prove, that Einstein used De Pretto's research," said Professor Bartocci, who has written a book on the subject. (The Guardian Unlimited).

Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.

Thus, we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.' EVERYTHING ELSE WAS PLAGIARIZED. Over the next few years, Poincaré‚ became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein.

Thus, while Poincaré‚ was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.

This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827.

The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.

The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.

That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J. J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré‚ had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era.

Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenöhrl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.

Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2 was the logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.

THUS, THE EXPERIMENTS OF THOMSON, KAUFMANN, AND FINALLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, HASENÖRHL, CONFIRMED MAXWELL'S WORK. IT IS LUDICROUS TO BELIEVE THAT EINSTEIN DEVELOPED THIS POSTULATE, particularly in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments.

In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)."

This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic scientific principles, and that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible experience."

The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is particularly important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he UNJUSTLY received his 1922 Nobel Prize.

But AGAIN IT IS NOT EINSTEIN, BUT WILHELM WIEN AND MAX PLANCK WHO DESERVE THE CREDIT. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.

Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough.

Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of energy -- light energy. But the principles and equations governing the process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.

After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it was arranged by World Jewry for him to take a position at a school.

Still, it was not until a 1919 A Jewish newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety. With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly.

He engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at least take partial credit.

In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915.

BUT THE MATHEMATICAL WORK WAS NOT DONE BY EINSTEIN -- HE WAS INCAPABLE OF IT. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.

The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect.

It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he, "completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.

Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking.

However, the exact opposite is true. EINSTEIN STOLE THE MAJORITY OF HIS GENERAL RELATIVITY WORK FROM THESE TWO MEN, THE REST BEING TAKEN FROM GROSSMANN. HILBERT SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION, A WEEK BEFORE EINSTEIN COMPLETED HIS WORK, A PAPER WHICH CONTAINED THE CORRECT FIELD EQUATIONS, OF GENERAL RELATIVITY.

What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a lecture.

Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.

Therefore, THIS SERVES AS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT EINSTEIN QUICKLY PLAGIARIZED THE WORK AND THEN PRESENTED IT, HOPING TO BEAT HILBERT TO THE PUNCH. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.

Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.

That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory of relativity." However the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.

As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jew-controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.

On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science -- New theory of the Universe -- Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, EINSTEIN RECEIVED THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR THE WORK HE HAD STOLEN IN 1905 REGARDING THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT.

The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to be today.

As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues.

This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved.

The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.

The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.

The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry.

NO, THE JEWS DID NOT WANT HEISENBERG PROMOTED AS A GENIUS BECAUSE HE WOULD GO ON TO HEAD THE GERMAN ATOMIC BOMB PROJECT AND SERVE PRISON TIME AFTER THE WAR FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE THIRD REICH.

No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work.

Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says, "But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance - then, according to Einstein, you are wrong"

Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy.

But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.

In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein visited Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he became a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by criticizing the work of Schr”dinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumed his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.

In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for either.

In December of 1946, Einstein rekindled his efforts for a World Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continued through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically, was offered the presidency of Israel. He declined. In 1953, he spent his time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supported Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer. He encouraged civil in response to the McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this Jewish demagogue died.

Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew-controlled Time Magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century".

Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was still living by Time Magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious candidate. Still the issue of Time Magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many things in this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes:

"Einstein was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schr”dinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. Einstein was horrified by this. Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half-century".

This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schr”dinger's work in unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but Einstein, who proved himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field theory.

To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time Magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally changed the lands 20th century science, then the obvious choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms of science today would be basically in the same place that they were in the late 1940s.

However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded Shockley Semiconductor the first company in Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to start Fairchild semiconductor in 1957 (co-founded by the "Traitorous Eight": Julius Blank, Victor Grinich, Jean Hoerni, Gene Kleiner, Jay Last, Gordon Moore, Robert Noyce and Sheldon Roberts. Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore left Fairchild in 1968 to found Intelco. Many other Fairchild employees later the company - later called Intel.

No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be recognized, not Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything white.

After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was asked what he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war and said:

"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870. Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting".

Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that this is the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one thing, the Germans did knowingly support the cause of National Socialism, but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was Christianity that led the German people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It was the German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like Karl Lueger that led the German people to their understanding of Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis of National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by Prager and Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call 'anti-Semitism.' Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews, hated Christianity. So what Einstein was really advocating was the killing and constraining of all true Christians, not just Germans Christians. This is the true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.

Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the mortal enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Nazi Germany so much, for National Socialist Germany advocated primitive, positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party Platform.

Lewis L. Strauss, the Zionist Chairman of the US Atomic Commission, must have had in mind storing the world stock of A and H bombs in the neutral country of Israel (also chosen for the United Nations' permanent headquarters) for safekeeping to 'satisfy Russian demands,' when, as reported in the London Jewish Chronicle of 11th December, 1953, he 'assisted' President Eisenhower in writing the speech in which Eisenhower told the UN General Assembly that the USA would be prepared to ease international tension by handing over her Atom and Hydrogen weapons to UNO. Eisenhower does not hesitate to accept the advice of Strauss, although this Zionist financier is senior partner in the New York International Banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. which in 1917, under the direction of Jacob Schiff, then the acknowledged leader of world Jewry, financed the Bolshevist revolutionary Trotsky to the extent of 20 million dollars.

Albert Einstein, the Zionist scientist, (described by Pravda as one of the ten best friends of the Soviet Union in the USA) was also thinking along the same lines when he persuaded Roosevelt (Redfield) to authorize research into nuclear fission, and recommended the employment of other Zionist scientists, who were later to pass the result of the researches to the Soviet Union.

Oppenheimer, the chief Einstein appointee, now in disgrace for Communist sympathies, and holding up production of the hydrogen bombs until Russia came into possession of its secrets: Pontecorvo, the entire host of Zionist scientists and agents working for Communism in the notorious spy rings of America, Canada, Australia and Great Britain: all have obviously been striving to bring about the present situation.

It is this overriding ambition which drives Zionists, even the most wealthy, to support Communism, either openly or secretly, only to bring the world to a point where it would seem it must accept their long envisaged 'peace plan.' "One of the major reasons for my visit to the United States," said the mayor of Jerusalem, according to the South African Jewish Times of 14th March, 1952, "is to interest Americans in the beautification of Jerusalem, the Capital of the World, no less than the Capital of Israel."

It all has been decided as described above. Why has so little been heard about it? For the simple reason that IT HAS BEEN DECIDED. The matter will not be thrown open for Gentile discussion in the popular (?) press UNTIL the Nations are browbeaten to the point where they are ready to acknowledge the Zionists' "International Super-Government, and WITH SUBMISSIVENESS".

(Note: On November 21, 1954, Czecho-Slovakia called upon the Western Powers to delay signing the Paris Agreement regarding the re-armament of West Germany, until they had discussed with the Russian bloc an agreement which might eventually result in a United States of Europe. A 'United States of Europe' was the aim of Trotsky stated in Bolshevism and World Peace, published in 1918. "The task of the proletariat is to create a still more powerful fatherland with a far greater power of resistance - the Republican United States of Europe, as the foundation of the United States of the World").

Jews have been heavily overrepresented among the ranks of theoretical physicists. This conclusion remains true even though Einstein, the leading figure among Jewish physicists, was a strongly motivated Zionist (F”lsing 1997, 494505), opposed assimilation as a contemptible form of mimicry (p. 490), preferred to mix with other Jews whom he referred to as his tribal companions (p. 489), embraced the uncritical support for the Bolshevik regime in Russia typical of so many Jews during the 1920s and 1930s, including persistent apology for the Moscow show trials in the 1930s (pp. 6445), and switched from a high-minded pacifism during World War I, when Jewish interests were not at stake, to advocating the building of atomic bombs to defeat Hitler. From his teenage years he disliked the Germans and in later life criticized Jewish colleagues for converting to Christianity and acting like Prussians. He especially disliked Prussians, who were the elite ethnic group in Germany. Reviewing his life at age 73, Einstein declared his ethnic affiliation in no uncertain terms: 'My relationship with Jewry had become my strongest human tie once I achieved complete clarity about our precarious position among the nations' (in F”lsing 1997, 488). According to F”lsing, Einstein had begun developing this clarity from an early age, but did not acknowledge it until much later, a form of self-deception: As a young man with bourgeois-liberal views and a belief in enlightenment, he had refused to acknowledge it until much later, a form of self-deception: As a young man with bourgeois-liberal views and a belief in enlightenment, he had refused to acknowledge [his Jewish identity] (in F”lsing 1997, 488). einstein.htm

[MWanden]

Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
Oh my, have we ever been taken, but good!
Unable to tie his own shoelaces...

by Joseph Wallace
Reformat by Henry Ayre
From: General Lee <im4dixie2@yahoo.com>
Source: NATIONALIST FREE PRESS
http://www.nationalistfreepress.com/
January, 2001

One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish media
is the following from Mein
Kampf, I:10:

"The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big
lie than to a small one."

Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray this
statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But if we read this
selection in context, we find that he is speaking of the Jews who had ruined
his country, and he is trying to explain how the German people fell victim
to Jewish lies.

In fact, Herr Hitler even tells us what this great lie is that duped the
German people into being controlled by the Jews. He continues:

"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the application
of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the Jews; for their
entire existence is built on one single great lie, namely, that here one had
to deal with a religious brotherhood, while in fact one has to deal with a
race ­ what a race!

As such they have been nailed down forever, in an eternally correct sentence
of fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind; he called
them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize this or does
not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to victory in this world."

Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th century
German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature of Jews.

Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed Germany and what have destroyed
America today. Herr Hitler may have been correct in what he felt was the greatest
Jewish lie, but there are many, many more which have had a damning effect
on the white race. One of the greatest is certainly the lie of the Hebrew Masoretic
Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from the hands of white Christians,
but each Jewish myth stings with the same poisonous venom. One of the great
Jewish myths of the 20th century is Albert Einstein.


Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who drastically
changed the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is made an idol to young
people and his very name has become synonymous with genius. The truth,
however, is very different. The reality is that Einstein was an inept, moronic
Jew who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed nothing original
to the field of quantum mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary
he stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero.


When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only
brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other people's ideas, passing
them off as his own. Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part
of this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education
that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15,
"with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with
no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination
and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an
engineering school in Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of mathematical
problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this
exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to
the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900,
he still could not get a position at the engineering school! Unable to go to the
school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the
patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which
meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified position. Even
after publishing his so-called groundbreaking papers of 1905 and after
working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class
standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he
was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics,
but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet
he was barely qualified.

He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying
to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true,
but now begins the Jewish myth. Supposedly, while working a full time job,
without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a
laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting,
Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of
theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.
Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein
himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these
ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only
logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such
documents at the age of 26 without any real education. However, a simpler
explanation exists: he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers.

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of
each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's
worshippers as totally new and completely different, each of which would
change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following
four ideas, respectively:

1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2) The equivalence of energy and mass;
3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4) The special theory of relativity.

Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity.
This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically,
this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity
(the General Theory would come in 1915). This theory contradicted the traditional
Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises: 1) in the absence of
acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and 2) since the
speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval
between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference
the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of
reference the events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea that time
passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.

This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for
modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's.
First of all, the idea that the speed of light was a constant and was independent
of the motion of its source was not Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the
Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light
extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He wrote
an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing
debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley
reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity
of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known
27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.

This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct
an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not
understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion of the
earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the
propagation of light.

In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald,
who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a
paper which stated that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could
be explained if,

"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving
through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the square of
the ratio of their velocities to that of light."

This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!

Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed the
same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's,
both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely
similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the
Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote
down equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz transformations,
the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz.
They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time
dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already
been published.

The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these
ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,

"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The
simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the
equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the
statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."

Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the
similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we see that
the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.'
Everything else was plagiarized. Over the next few years, Poincaré became
one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he
never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while
Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding
relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office in Bern and no one in
the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence or mention
to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.

This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another
of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a
body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which
the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the
Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this phenomenon
has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs
and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert
Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the
famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by
the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.

The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third
paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous
equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous
and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of
Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was
published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass
equivalence was not original with Einstein.

That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the
laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship for
all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable
source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant,
yet unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of
the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He
had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years
and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which
Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in
this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna
Academy of Sciences.

Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple
deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James
Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship expressed
by the equation E=mc2 was the logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did
not believe it. Thus, the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and
most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It is ludicrous to believe
that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly in light of the fact that Einstein
did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments.

In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific
community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose
energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for this was truly an
outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not
understand basic scientific principles and that he was writing about a topic that
he did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that
such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible experience."

The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of
the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The
photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or
semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is particularly
important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly
received his 1922 Nobel Prize.

But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who deserve
the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given
credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This
was the explanation for the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had
been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp
Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the first to show
that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect was not
governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was
an important breakthrough.

Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day
quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had
shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called
quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905
was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of energy ­
light energy. But the principles and equations governing the process in general
had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious
conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of
energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.

After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community
took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909
when it was arranged for him to take a position at a school by World Jewry.
Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position
where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly. He
engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had
supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could
present the research as his own or at least take partial credit. In this vein, in
1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in terms of a new,
recently developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity.

This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would
publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was not done by Einstein ­ he was
incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel Grossmann,
who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Berhard Riemann,
who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is
the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.

The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the
universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and the
general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object.
Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work which
Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper
was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It appears that
Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was
forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published
his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication
that he,

"completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David
Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century,
and Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the
development of the area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop
the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.

Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe
that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General
Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking. However, the
exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his General Relativity work
from these two men, the rest being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert submitted
for publication, a week before Einstein completed his work, a paper which contained
the correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means is that Hilbert
wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein
did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all
along, because there were Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet,
even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of
publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered
in the form of a lecture.

Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had
presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert
received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the
treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy
of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the
two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance
copy of his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein
quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert
to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle
Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an effort
to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending
Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.

Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality
than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions
made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was
much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field theory
of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger,
whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.

That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the
ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In
1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before
Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the
foundations of the theory of relativity." However, the Jewish media did not
promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work
of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.

As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first
and in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should
bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the
Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was observed to bend
according to the theory. This evidence supported the General Theory of Relativity,
and the Jewish-controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to
prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.

On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of
which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe -
Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding
of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier
1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator
of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in
1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905
regarding the photoelectric effect.

The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been
established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his
image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed
to be today. As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World
Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant
as to change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly
we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues. This
is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of
social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert
to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a
strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names
were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934,
the day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as
President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf
Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in the
German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert
receiving the credit he deserved.

The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either.
This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German
theologians, and during World War II he would stay in Germany throughout
the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.

The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be
heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to
teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter
expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the
unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it
had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.

The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius,
even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it
greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to
describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are
essential to modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted
as a genius because he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project
and serve prison time after the war for his involvement with the Third Reich.

No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white
Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even
Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from
which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to erect
Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed
himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he had
supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front
page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of
practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says,

"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that
man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy­to drive a great
steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance­then, according
to Einstein, you are wrong"

Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had
supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical
research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear
energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real
attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose ­
evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish
other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one
other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with
the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors
in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia,
Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.

In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund-raising
tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April
of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission of the
League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In
June of 1923, he becomes a founding member of the Association of Friends of
the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and Zionistic
activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by criticizing the work of
Schrödinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic
agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.

In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he
would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war against
Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible
to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other Jews, wrote
two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic
bomb to be used on Germany ­ not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for
either.

In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World Government,
with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continues
through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in
the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically, is offered
the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his time attacking
the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert
Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy
trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this nasty little Jewish demagogue dies.

Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid
statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation
by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to promote the
myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the
men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to
aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in
the Jew-controlled Time magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the
Century" at the close of 1999. It may be demonstrated that the Jewish lies
have become more bold with the passage of time because Einstein was never
named "Man of the Year" while he was alive, but now, over forty years after
his death, he is named "Person of the Century."

Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person
of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year"
while he was still living by Time magazine, and according to a December 27,
1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler because
of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would accompany that
choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top
serious candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein,
which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine,
and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary to
include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice, Adolf
Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which purports
to be a history of the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the
things in this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory
of Relativity before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the
concept of relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,

"Einstein was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in
Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich, who
developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. Einstein was
horrified by this. Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new
quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations.
They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology
and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed
the world in the past half-century."

This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of
the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was
so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern
science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field theory which
was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded"
Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified field theory,
but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century
scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field
theory.

To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous
and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson,
Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time
magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an inventor or scientist,
then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or
Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally
changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious choice would be
William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor,
which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and computers, everything
from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing computers
which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without the
transistor, all forms of science today would be basically in the same place that
they were in the late 1940s.

However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley because
he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental
inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic
views led the Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first company in
the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his
entire staff and used them to start Fairchild semiconductor, the company that today
is known as Intel.

No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be recognized,
not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who helped the
National Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to
National Socialist causes, and certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist,
Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything white.


After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of the
Germans in particular in the following statements. He was asked what he thought
about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war and said,

"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870. Behind
the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his
book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but
they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting"

Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that
this is the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one thing,
the Germans did knowingly support the cause of National Socialism, but what
Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was Christianity that led the
German people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It was the
German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like
Karl Lueger that led the German people to their understanding of Jews. The
Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis of National
Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and
the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by Prager and Telushkin similarly
proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call 'anti-Semitism.' Einstein
understood this and Einstein, like all Jews, hated Christianity. So what Einstein
was really advocating was the killing and constraining of all true Christians,
not just German Christians. This is the true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.

Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the mortal
enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Nazi
Germany so much, for National Socialist Germany advocated primitive,
positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party Platform.


(Article used by permission of and © CSCS, POB 188,
Kodak, TN 37764).

[koyuca]

ay nanita, ya llegó mr. iknowalotofshit a confirmar la afirmación de einstein:
el valor de la política, pasajero; el de una ecuación eterno

inche acomplejado

:D
:D:D

[Pedro Navajas]

mwaden:

este es un tema que me interesa debatir contigo. ¿cómo le hacemos?

Humildemente te digo que la modalidad de traer escritos de terceros me da hueva y de antemano estas perdido en tal modalidad: ¿tienes idea de la cantidad de libros que sobre la obra de Einstein existen? Hablando cantidad: por cada byte de texto contra lo obra de Einstein que tu encuentres, hay un giga de información en las universidades del mundo, un mega en la red y ni un kilo de ganas de leerte...

Te propongo que nos centremos en estos temas:

A)
Entre la cantidad de basura que dices, hay algo con un toque de verdad: la relatividad especial se basa en las transformaciones de Lorenz (mi tocayo). Cuando uno estudia relatividad especial, no se enseñan las "transformadas de Einstein", como tu erroneamente crees, sino las transformadas de Lorenz. ¿cual plagio? te propongo debatir tales transformaciones, el significado que les dio Lorenz y el significado que les dio Einstein.

B)
La relatividad especial ha sido probada muchas veces. Principalmente en en el estudio de partículas elementales. Te propongo traerte al menos un caso donde las observaciones no podrían explicarse sin la relatividad especial.

C)
Nada dices de las aportaciones de Einstein en la mecánica cuántica ni en la física estadística. Te propongo que las revisemos.

D)
Dices una mentira terrible: Einstein nada tuvo que ver con el holocausto nuclear. Más alla de una ser un firmante más de una carta colectiva que prevenia al gobierno americano de la posibilidad de que los alemanes trataran de fabricar el artefacto, Einstein no tuvo nada que ver la fabricación de la bomba, mucho menos con las decisiones de fabricarla o de usarla... te propongo no debatir este tema...

E)
Para que entiendas lo absurdo de las afirmaciones que haces, debería entender como funciona la ciencia. Si lo supieras, te darías cuenta de la gran tonteria que es afirmar que sin laboratorios o recursos no se puede aportar a la ciencia teorías revolucionarias. Te propongo debatir este tema: aegún tu, ¿cuales son los mecanismos para generar conocimiento en las ciencias exactas?

Tu tienes la palabra: debatimos con inteligencia, o te quedas a nivel de la consigna fácil...

[Pedro Navajas]

D2 y spider:

En estos años,aunque no lo crean, les he adquirido cierta estima.

En nombre de esa estiima, como valedor, les digo: No escupan al cielo...

Una cosa es creer que el 9/11 es una conspiración judia y otra muy diferente, a años luz, está la disparatada idea de que Einstein no tenga meritos para ser, por mucho, el hombre más influyente, no del siglo XX, sino del segundo milenio de la era moderna (ya sabemos quien fue el hombre del primer milenio)...

Con gusto voy a abrir un tema para discutir en que medida las ideas de Eisntein fueron fundamentales para que nosotros podamos hoy debatir en este medio, escuchar música con calidad CD, saber la edad, tamaño y composición del universo, discutir sobre la eutanacia, la clonación, la bioetica, etc... En suma, aunque 7 mil millones de personas no tengan clara conciencia de ello, la realidad es que la realidad es gracias a Einstein...

buenas noches...

[Spiderman]

D2 y spider:

En estos años,aunque no lo crean, les he adquirido cierta estima.

Por mi parte, 100% correspondido camarada.


En nombre de esa estiima, como valedor, les digo: No escupan al cielo...

Una cosa es creer que el 9/11 es una conspiración judia y otra muy diferente, a años luz, está la disparatada idea de que Einstein no tenga meritos para ser, por mucho, el hombre más influyente, no del siglo XX, sino del segundo milenio de la era moderna (ya sabemos quien fue el hombre del primer milenio)...

Órale! ¿En dónde escribí afirmativamente que Einstein se plagió teorías de otros? Solamente le pedí a MWanden si podía poner ligas serias a esos plagios. Así que no entiendo a qué te refieres con "escupir al cielo"...


Con gusto voy a abrir un tema para discutir en que medida las ideas de Eisntein fueron fundamentales para que nosotros podamos hoy debatir en este medio, escuchar música con calidad CD, saber la edad, tamaño y composición del universo, discutir sobre la eutanacia, la clonación, la bioetica, etc... En suma, aunque 7 mil millones de personas no tengan clara conciencia de ello, la realidad es que la realidad es gracias a Einstein...

buenas noches...

Será muy interesante de leer.

Saludos.

:015:

[Le Rouge]

Spider, acostúmbrate a Pedro, esta es como la LVI ocasión en que viene a calumniar a alguien jajaja

[Spiderman]

A mi no me parece que calumnie, sino que no lee con detenimiento cada palabra.

Saludos.

[Tannat]

Pedro:

Te quedaste corto en tu punto D)

Además de que Einstein NO PARTICIPO en el Proyecto Manhatan, lo cierto es que fue de los MAYORES IMPULSORES a las corrientes que rechazaban el desarrollo de armas nucleares !!

Es más... en alguna época, los "antijudios" decía que esa actitud de Einstein era JUSTAMENTE para debilitar a EE.UU. en contra de sus enemigos ruso-judios.
Resulta que ahora es AL REVES !!

Bueno... ya sabes que para aquellos que odian a los judios cualquier argumento vale !!

:-)

[MWanden]

mwaden:

este es un tema que me interesa debatir contigo. ¿cómo le hacemos?

Humildemente te digo que la modalidad de traer escritos de terceros me da hueva y de antemano estas perdido en tal modalidad: ¿tienes idea de la cantidad de libros que sobre la obra de Einstein existen? Hablando cantidad: por cada byte de texto contra lo obra de Einstein que tu encuentres, hay un giga de información en las universidades del mundo, un mega en la red y ni un kilo de ganas de leerte...

Te propongo que nos centremos en estos temas:

A)
Entre la cantidad de basura que dices, hay algo con un toque de verdad: la relatividad especial se basa en las transformaciones de Lorenz (mi tocayo). Cuando uno estudia relatividad especial, no se enseñan las "transformadas de Einstein", como tu erroneamente crees, sino las transformadas de Lorenz. ¿cual plagio? te propongo debatir tales transformaciones, el significado que les dio Lorenz y el significado que les dio Einstein.

B)
La relatividad especial ha sido probada muchas veces. Principalmente en en el estudio de partículas elementales. Te propongo traerte al menos un caso donde las observaciones no podrían explicarse sin la relatividad especial.

C)
Nada dices de las aportaciones de Einstein en la mecánica cuántica ni en la física estadística. Te propongo que las revisemos.

D)
Dices una mentira terrible: Einstein nada tuvo que ver con el holocausto nuclear. Más alla de una ser un firmante más de una carta colectiva que prevenia al gobierno americano de la posibilidad de que los alemanes trataran de fabricar el artefacto, Einstein no tuvo nada que ver la fabricación de la bomba, mucho menos con las decisiones de fabricarla o de usarla... te propongo no debatir este tema...

E)
Para que entiendas lo absurdo de las afirmaciones que haces, debería entender como funciona la ciencia. Si lo supieras, te darías cuenta de la gran tonteria que es afirmar que sin laboratorios o recursos no se puede aportar a la ciencia teorías revolucionarias. Te propongo debatir este tema: aegún tu, ¿cuales son los mecanismos para generar conocimiento en las ciencias exactas?

Tu tienes la palabra: debatimos con inteligencia, o te quedas a nivel de la consigna fácil...


Me niego a debatir nada con quien califica de "basura" las observaciones de su interlocutor. Lo siento, No way José.

[Tannat]

Mwaden:

Te gustan más las "consignas fáciles" ?

[MWanden]

Mwaden:

Te gustan más las "consignas fáciles" ?


El nombre es M WANDEN, lea con más cuidado o no le contestaré.


Explíquese...

[koyuca]

me sorprende la paciencia que le tienen al güanguen, cuya ignorancia sólo es superada por su soberbia

nomás lean sus respuestas:
Me niego a debatir nada con quien califica de "basura" las observaciones de su interlocutor

El nombre es M WANDEN, lea con más cuidado o no le contestaré.

el güanguen es un pinche idiota: él es quien inicia los insultos -- "...los pánfilos adorando..." --, y aún así se pone a exigir que se le tenga respeto

si quieren seguir debatiendo con el imbécil, nomás no se fastidien cuando descubran que la única y universal respuesta que tiene es que todo se debe a una conspiración judeo-talmudista

:D
:D:D

[MWanden]

me sorprende la paciencia que le tienen al güanguen, cuya ignorancia sólo es superada por su soberbia Eso lo dice quien tiene la cultura de un borrico, que no sabe hacer la O con un canuto y no sabe ni dónde tiene la mano derecha, garrulo muerto de hambre.
nomás lean sus respuestas:


el güanguen es un pinche idiota: él es quien inicia los insultos -- "...los pánfilos adorando..." --, y aún así se pone a exigir que se le tenga respeto El único imbécil que pulula por aquí es este asno con el insulto por delante, HIJO DE LA GRAN PUTA Y COMEMIERDA, no sabe siquiera diferenciar un insulto de un calificativo, CHORIZO.
si quieren seguir debatiendo con el imbécil, nomás no se fastidien cuando descubran que la única y universal respuesta que tiene es que todo se debe a una conspiración judeo-talmudista La misma por la que te parieron a ti por el culo de la PERRA DE TU MADRE el dia que el ASNO DE TU PADRE se estaba haciendo una paja y le salpicó a la CHUCHA SALIDA... así es la vida, accidentes desgraciados que no tienen compasión con los infelices...
:D
:D:D


No será que no he tenido paciencia y aguante con esta sabandija, sucursal de los dementes de siempre y su obsesión con quien son incapaces de entender. A la mierda.

[koyuca]

espectacular respuesta de mr. iknowalotofshit quien, quien columpiándose en sus propias babas, quiere sacar sus pezuñitas del fuego aduciendo que un calificativo no es un insulto

mala tarde para éste zoquete monotemático: la estupidez, así sea elegida voluntariamente, no es contagiosa

:D
:D:D

[Atila]

Ahora anda metido en Fisica?

Yo ya le habia aconsejado que no se metiera ni en Genetica ni en Antropologia...

[Tannat]

Falló en Cine también !! (creo que le debe una discusión sobre Polanski a Salinger)

:-)

[Don Tony Clifton]

mwanden, eres un imbecil...

[MWanden]

mwanden, eres un imbecil...


¿Y tu puta madre qué tal baila?

[MWanden]

Falló en Cine también !! (creo que le debe una discusión sobre Polanski a Salinger)

:-)


No le debo nada a nadie, esa discusión acabó hace tiempo, y mantendré siempre lo dicho: la película del delincuente judío Polanski es un BODRIO, con unas actuaciones de pena de otros judíos como Brody, y ya se puede poner patas arriba quien pretenda lo contrario.

[koyuca]

el pinche güanguen falla en todo, pero eso sí es un "lince" para detectar la conspiración judeo-talmúdica

edá güanguencito zoquete?

:D
:D:D

[MWanden]

el pinche güanguen falla en todo, pero eso sí es un "lince" para detectar la conspiración judeo-talmúdica

edá güanguencito zoquete?

:D
:D:D


Buen provecho...

[Antibush]

Entonces es cierto que a Mwanden le gusta la consigna fácil como Pedro Navajas demostró.

Lástima, habría sido entretenido ver cómo iban y venían las respuestas.

(me alegro de no haberme dado la lata de traducir sus post en inglés....después de todo parece que era puro copy /page)

Saludos.-

[MWanden]

Entonces es cierto que a Mwanden le gusta la consigna fácil como Pedro Navajas demostró.

Lástima, habría sido entretenido ver cómo iban y venían las respuestas.

(me alegro de no haberme dado la lata de traducir sus post en inglés....después de todo parece que era puro copy /page)

Saludos.-

Oiga, cada vez que me peo escribo más literatura que usted en su puta vida, y si no hay más debates es porque se permite que los gilipollas de siempre se dediquen a reventar los foros y como puede comprobar intercambiando insultos no se llega a ninguna parte.

COmo es evidente que usted no ha pasado de la primaria, no puede saber que las opiniones personales conviene reforzarlas con citas de otras opiniones, lo que usted llama despectivamente COPY/PAGE (es PASTE). Si se alegra de no calentarse el poco cerebro que tiene no es asunto mío.

[Tannat]

Mwanden:

En un Foro en ESPAÑOL -como este- no es obligatorio hablar inglés (y don Antibush mil veces aclaró que no es su caso).

En CUALQUIER FORO (inglés, español, birmano o chino) si suele ser intersante mantener el nivel de las charlas y no limitarse a cerrarlas con un:

"yo con Usted no hablo"

Cada vez que los argumentos del contrario son superiores a los propios.

Ahhh... y lo de la conspiración "judeo-masónico-sionista-plutocrática" ya lleva como 500 años y no consigue triunfar !!! (obviamente los que la llevan adelante son unos tarados), así que puede estar tranquilo, nos dejarán vivir según nuestras propias miserias por unos cuantos años más antes de dominar el mundo.

Nota: Conocen el cartón "Pinky y Cerebro" ?, algo me dice que esta conspiración la lleva adelante PINKY !!

Saludos Mwanden y disculpa que se me corrió una "m" en tu nick la vez pasada.

[Don Tony Clifton]

Mwanden, eres un pendejo...

[MWanden]

Mwanden:


"yo con Usted no hablo"

Cada vez que los argumentos del contrario son superiores a los propios. Es usted más fariseo que la madre que lo parió: le dije claramente que me negaba discutir con quien desprecia la opinión del interlocutor, que no es lo mismo, y pretender que sus "argumentos" son superiores cuando no dice nada ya le retrata.

Ahhh... y lo de la conspiración "judeo-masónico-sionista-plutocrática" ya lleva como 500 años y no consigue triunfar !!! (obviamente los que la llevan adelante son unos tarados), así que puede estar tranquilo, nos dejarán vivir según nuestras propias miserias por unos cuantos años más antes de dominar el mundo. Lo que usted diga.

Nota: Conocen el cartón "Pinky y Cerebro" ?, algo me dice que esta conspiración la lleva adelante PINKY !! Los únicos "cartones" que conozco son los que sirven para embalar, pero se agradece que dé indicios de su edad mental.
Saludos Mwanden y disculpa que se me corrió una "m" en tu nick la vez pasada.


No "gasto" ningún mote ni ningún alias ("nick" no es español), es mi nombre propio.

[MWanden]

Mwanden, eres un pendejo...


Otro imbécil con sus maravillosos "argumentos": que te den por el culo.

[Menezian]

ya no desesperes mamón ! en breve tu garañón ha de pedirte matrimonio.

http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2005/04/21/espana/1114087944.html

[Antibush]

Gracias Tannat por tratar de hacerle entender a Mwanden que mi fuerte no es el inglés -como ya lo dicho en más de una ocasión-; sin embargo, reconozco mi equivocación....debí postear que Mwanden se dedica al debate COPY/PASTE ...como él muy bien me corrigió, dada su alta experiencia en el uso de estas funciones.

Insisto,eso sí, en que es una verdadera lástima que rechace tan abiertamente una propuesta de debate tan interesante de parte de Pedro Navajas. Más aún cuando tiene la oportunidad de "demostrar" que "el bobo se ríe de todos".

Bueno, finalizo esta intervención con una frase célebre que encontré muy atingente para este caso:




"¡Triste época la nuestra! Es más fácil desintegrar un átomo que un prejuicio."

Albert Einstein



Saludos.-

[Don Tony Clifton]

Otro imbécil con sus maravillosos "argumentos": que te den por el culo.

No es un "argumento", pendejo,es una aseveracion...


MWanden, eres un sodomita...

[MWanden]

No es un "argumento", pendejo,es una aseveracion...


MWanden, eres un sodomita...

Sería una ofensa para su madre, a quien conocí por la calle, pero encima de TONTO eres un HIJO DE PUTA que va con la injuria y la calumnia por delante: QUE TE DEN POR EL CULO.

[MWanden]

Gracias Tannat por tratar de hacerle entender a Mwanden que mi fuerte no es el inglés -como ya lo dicho en más de una ocasión-; sin embargo, reconozco mi equivocación....debí postear que Mwanden se dedica al debate COPY/PASTE ...como él muy bien me corrigió, dada su alta experiencia en el uso de estas funciones.

Insisto,eso sí, en que es una verdadera lástima que rechace tan abiertamente una propuesta de debate tan interesante de parte de Pedro Navajas. Más aún cuando tiene la oportunidad de "demostrar" que "el bobo se ríe de todos".

Bueno, finalizo esta intervención con una frase célebre que encontré muy atingente para este caso:




"¡Triste época la nuestra! Es más fácil desintegrar un átomo que un prejuicio."

Albert Einstein



Saludos.-

Cuánto lamento que no sepa inglés, pero no voy a perder el tiempo traduciéndole nada, los artículos lo dicen todo. Contrate a un traductor.

También se equivoca con su frase porque aquí no hay prejuicios que valgan sino juicios a posteriori y basados en los hechos, que no son otros que los que se conocen: Einstein era un bobo y un impostor, incapaz de cálculos matemáticos elementales para poder considerar ninguna de sus pretendidas "teorías" como suyas.

Comprenderá que no es mi intención convencer a ningún tonto, sería lo mismo que tratar de hacerle entender a un burro su propia naturaleza de bestia, sino debatir con personas inteligentes que tengan algo que aportar, porque los insultos son el recurso triste de los incapaces.

[Pedro Navajas]

el magüaden no acepto una invitación (respetuosa -excepto por la palabra 'basura'- y con temas bien concretos) a discutir física...

pero con gusto le ha entrado a lidiarse a insultos...

se ve cual es su nivel. Esa es la mejor defensa de Einstein: la calidad de quienes lo atacan...

[Don Tony Clifton]

Sería una ofensa para su madre, a quien conocí por la calle, pero encima de TONTO eres un HIJO DE PUTA que va con la injuria y la calumnia por delante: QUE TE DEN POR EL CULO.

Injuria y calumnia? Juar, juar... pos te invito a que me lo pruebes y me lo sostengas... eso de que dizque conociste a mi madre, digo , sino quieres quedar como un pinche hablador...

Mwanden, sos un boludo...

[MWanden]

el magüaden no acepto una invitación (respetuosa -excepto por la palabra 'basura'- y con temas bien concretos) a discutir física...

pero con gusto le ha entrado a lidiarse a insultos...

se ve cual es su nivel. Esa es la mejor defensa de Einstein: la calidad de quienes lo atacan...

¿A eso lo llama usted respeto? Por favor, déjese de cuentos y si quiere debatir sobre el tema, hágalo ya le rebatiré lo que crea oportuno.

[MWanden]

Injuria y calumnia? Juar, juar... pos te invito a que me lo pruebes y me lo sostengas... eso de que dizque conociste a mi madre, digo , sino quieres quedar como un pinche hablador...

Mwanden, sos un boludo...


¿Cómo va usted a conocer a su madre?

[Don Tony Clifton]

Mwanden, no te duele la cabeza con tan elaboradas respuestas?

Eres un pelotudo...

[MWanden]

Mwanden, no te duele la cabeza con tan elaboradas respuestas?

Eres un pelotudo...



... a su madre, me refiero.

[Don Tony Clifton]

Mwanden, pos a mi me gustas como para ponerte de cañon y darte pa los chicles...

Eres un papanatas...

[MWanden]

Mwanden, pos a mi me gustas como para ponerte de cañon y darte pa los chicles...

Eres un papanatas...


Y usted un SOPLAPOLLAS. Abra otro foro para insultarme y deje debatir en paz, tonto del culo.

[Don Tony Clifton]

tonto del culo.

Juar, juar, juar, juar... por la expresion, me imagino que eres gachupin. Se oye botana, ni parece insulto... juar, juar, juar... como cagaria alguien tonto del culo? salpicaria la porcelana? o escribiria con faltas de ortografia?


Nota de L. Cyber: Estas peleíllas van subiendo de tono en cuanto a insultos y a gráficos. Edité esta última imagen de Don Tony Clifton por asquerosa y para evitar llevar el tema completo a La Marranera.



Y para que no te enojes MWanden ya no te voy a insultar aqui, voy a abrirte un topic especifico para insultarte, como la ves?










...

[Lagos]

precisamente para eso es "la marranera"...pásenle allí , con confianza están en su casa.